List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Formulate a decorative coating | 1.1 | Confirm the specification/performance requirements of the decorative coating |
| 1.2 | Determine the effect on performance characteristics of formulation parameters |
| 1.3 | Specify required quality control and performance tests |
| 1.4 | Recommend appropriate raw materials |
| 1.5 | Recommend appropriate raw material suppliers |
| 1.6 | Formulate a decorative coating to specified parameters |
| 1.7 | Ensure laboratory formulations are converted to production scale |
|
2 | Specify the relationship of pigment/binder for a coating | 2.1 | Define pigment/binder relationships and their impact on coating properties |
| 2.2 | Calculate pigment/binder ratio, and pigment volume concentration (PVC) |
| 2.3 | Specify pigment/binder relationships appropriate for a coating |
|
3 | Recommend a method of manufacture | 3.1 | Identify critical formulation parameters and the effect on manufacturing characteristics for decorative coatings |
| 3.2 | Determine dispersion, let down and mixing required |
| 3.3 | Select the types of equipment required for coating manufacture |
| 3.4 | Recommend a method of manufacture |
|
4 | Identify and control hazards | 4.1 | Identify material hazards |
| 4.2 | Identify regulatory requirements |
| 4.3 | Identify other hazards from the manufacture of decorative coatings |
| 4.4 | Recommend appropriate hazard control |
|
5 | Recommend a coating application method | 5.1 | Distinguish between common decorative coating application methods |
| 5.2 | Recommend an application method for decorative coatings |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
evaluate raw materials against specifications, including:
chemistry
structure
physical and chemical properties relevant to surface coating
modification reactions as relevant (e.g. alkyds)
hazards
impact on environment
pigment/binder relationship
determine the impact of key variables on formulation and manufacture, including:
substrates
physical properties
cost of raw materials
application methods
curing conditions
drying times
pigment/binder relationship
select materials for purpose
calculate formulations to customer's requirements
isolate the causes of problems and to be able to distinguish between causes of problems, such as:
incorrect equipment
incorrect raw materials
inadequate ventilation when manufacturing
inability to meet customer specifications
inadequate quality control tests
recommend appropriate manufacturing procedure
recommend appropriate application method (brush, roller or spray)
complete written/electronic records
communicate effectively with internal and external stakeholders.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
types and impact of pigment binder relationships, including:
specific gravity
weight and volume solids
pigment/binder ratio
pigment volume concentration (PVC)
formulation parameters
flow point curves
safety data sheets (SDS)
toxicity and other hazards of raw materials
types of raw materials and their chemical properties and functions
impact of differing raw material suppliers
principles of dispersion, let down and mixing
types and application of equipment used for coating manufacture
quality control methods
test methods
organisation procedures
duty of care obligations
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment, and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or practical assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work